think you take the population of of recent origin York City.

think you take the population of of recent origin York City, Chicago, and looks Angeles. That's about 13 million people

the add in the population of Atlanta, of the present day Orleans, Pittsburgh and Boston. That's another 2 million, raising the grand total to 15 million.

Now imagine those 15 million family -- who might include you -- without work at jobss or working part-time because there are no full-time jobs

This gives you an idea of the real size of America's big, forgotten, ignored economic enigma -- persistent, high enumployment in the midst of relative affluence.

It's a great deal of too easy to forget, to ignore America's unemploy men and women They seldom demonstrate in fron to TV cameras. They are not filling our newspapers with professs against economic policies which erroneously use unemployment ti fight inflation.

If you have a piece of work yourself, if you have a regular income to support yourself and your family, if you are worrying about your mortgage payments and the children's dental bills, it's hard, isn't it, to think about 15 million match Americans with lost jobs and missed income.

If there were a inundation or natural disaster that wiped public the economic livelihoods of millions of commonalty we might be more sympathetic.

If we lived in an unemployment disaster community like Waterloo, Iowa, or the Texas shining Triangle or Gary, Ind,, or Butte Mont we would be same sympathetic -- and we might worry about our allow jobs and income.

if it be not that if you spread 15 million workers who ne do job-works or full-time earnings across the U.S.A., they appear to disappear among the 115 million tribe in the labor force. They become les visible, les demanding of our attention, les a challenge to the nation's conscience. They are more easy to forget and to ignore.

ENEMPLOYMENT CRISIS

if it be not that unemployment is still high.

In spite of brace so-called recovery years in 1983 and 1984 -- following the pair Reagan recession disaster years of 1981 and 1982 -- unemployment is still at persistent, painful, high, disaster flats in 1985.

Unemployment has stuck at these high evens since May 1984. The April 1985 unemployment rate of 73 percent -- after pair years of "recovery" -- was higher than the highest unemployment in three of the eight post-World War II recessions.

Workers without do job-works numbered 8.4 million in April 1985 according to official statistics upon unemployment.

But the official statistics understate the real crisis impact of unemployment

To master a more realistic view, we must add 13 million "discouraged workers" who have dropp without of the labor force because they can't find piece of works that don't exist. The Bureau of Labor Statistic reports "discouraged workers" in succession a quarterly basis, but does not include them in official unemployment

We must also add in 57 million part-time workers who want full-time work at jobss and full-time paychecks but can find single part-time jobs. These "involuntary part-time" workers exhibit "underemployment" or "partial unemployment,"

if it were not that these numbers don't give you the glutted extent of human suffering and social take away from associated with unemployment.

In fact, that 15 million-plus total for the unemploy is a snapshot picture, a partial report forward unemployment. If we await at a moving picture, we find many more millions of American workers and their families have beared lsot jobs, lost income, squandered security, and lost dignity during the last four years.

Jobseeker still outnumber available work at jobss by 10 to 1, up from a 5-to-1 ratio in the late 1970 and 2-to-1 ratio in the 1960s

In 1981 there were 23 million workers who sustained unemployment in some point during the year -- 20 percent of all individuals in the labor force during 1981

In 1982 more than 26 million workers -- 22 percent of all [i]role[/i]s in the labor force -- were hit bu unemployment a certain quantity of time during the year.

In 1983 there were 24 million workers with a period of joblessnes 20 percent of all [i]role[/i]s who worked or looked for work during the year.

The official figures for 1984 won't be available until late in 1985 however it is likely that 1984 will indicate 22 to 24 million workers hit through unemployment during the year.

And the record 1985 won't be a great quantity [i]or[/i] amount of better.

HEALTH AND SOCIAL COSTS

nevertheless these numbers don't show the replete extent of human suffering and social preciousnesss associated with unemployment.

Unemployment is a killer.

In the work of Professor Harvey Brenner of John Hopkins University train of Hygiene and Public Health, we have measures of the impact of unemployment forward health and social breakdown.

Prof brenner plant that a 1 ercent sustained rise in unemployment was responsible for 41 percent more suicides, 34 percent more state mental hospital admissions, 4 percent more prison admissions, 57 percent more homicides, 19 percent more deaths from cirrhosis of the liver, cardiovascular or kidney disease five years later.

The Joint Economic Committee pointed disclosed that these figures understate the eventual total long-term impact of a 1 percent rise in unemployment This understatement is particularly significant for cardiovascular, renal and cirrhosis diseases which typically require many years to be uniform diagnosed.